🔗 Share this article

As a game master, I usually steered clear of heavy use of randomization during my Dungeons & Dragons sessions. My preference was for the plot and session development to be shaped by deliberate decisions instead of the roll of a die. However, I chose to alter my method, and I'm very glad I did.

The Catalyst: Seeing a Custom Mechanic

A well-known streamed game utilizes a DM who frequently asks for "chance rolls" from the participants. He does this by choosing a specific dice and assigning possible results tied to the roll. This is at its core no distinct from using a pre-generated chart, these get invented on the spot when a player's action lacks a obvious resolution.

I chose to experiment with this approach at my own session, primarily because it seemed interesting and offered a departure from my normal practice. The results were remarkable, prompting me to think deeply about the often-debated tension between pre-determination and spontaneity in a roleplaying game.

A Memorable Session Moment

During one session, my players had just emerged from a city-wide fight. Afterwards, a cleric character wondered if two friendly NPCs—a brother and sister—had lived. Instead of deciding myself, I asked for a roll. I asked the player to roll a d20. The possible results were: a low roll, both died; a middling roll, only one succumbed; on a 10+, they both lived.

Fate decreed a 4. This triggered a profoundly moving scene where the characters came upon the remains of their friends, forever united in death. The party held a ceremony, which was particularly meaningful due to prior story developments. In a concluding touch, I decided that the remains were suddenly restored, containing a enchanted item. I rolled for, the item's magical effect was precisely what the group lacked to address another major quest obstacle. One just plan these kinds of serendipitous coincidences.

Honing DM Agility

This experience led me to ponder if randomization and thinking on your feet are actually the core of D&D. While you are a meticulously planning DM, your skill to pivot need exercise. Groups frequently take delight in derailing the most carefully laid plots. Therefore, a good DM must be able to adapt swiftly and create content in the moment.

Employing on-the-spot randomization is a great way to develop these talents without going completely outside your preparation. The strategy is to deploy them for low-stakes situations that won't drastically alter the session's primary direction. As an example, I would avoid using it to establish if the central plot figure is a secret enemy. Instead, I could use it to figure out if the party reach a location just in time to see a major incident unfolds.

Strengthening Collaborative Storytelling

Luck rolls also helps make players feel invested and cultivate the sensation that the story is alive, evolving according to their actions as they play. It prevents the sense that they are merely pawns in a DM's sole script, thereby strengthening the collaborative aspect of storytelling.

This philosophy has historically been embedded in the original design. The game's roots were reliant on random tables, which fit a game focused on treasure hunting. While modern D&D often prioritizes plot-driven play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, that may not be the required method.

Finding the Sweet Spot

Absolutely no issue with being prepared. However, equally valid no problem with stepping back and letting the rolls to guide minor details in place of you. Control is a major factor in a DM's role. We need it to facilitate play, yet we can be reluctant to give some up, even when doing so could be beneficial.

My final suggestion is this: Have no fear of relinquishing a bit of control. Embrace a little chance for smaller story elements. The result could create that the unexpected outcome is infinitely more powerful than anything you might have planned on your own.